@sjr04Alt what is with you and reviving dead threads?!
also, never said that. never said that in the slightest
furthermore, upvotes are indeed scarce. just because you have 200 upvotes doesn't necessarily mean upvotes aren't scarce. upvotes are very hard to come across, because again, people either do not have the ability to upvote due to low amounts of rep, they don't visit answered questions, or they just don't acknowledge the upvote button.
others also agree with me on this topic.. professor agreed with me, cockerel agreed with me.. and others that are leaving my head, i only remembered the people that I talk to semi-often.
this conversation is dead. there is no point on furthering this topic, i already mentioned that this request will not happen. stop pulling fallacies out of your you-know-what because you don't have an argument.
I think it's because StackEdit was causing issues for a lot of people. For those people, problems ranged from StackEdit not loading and instead showing a white window to StackEdit not letting people encode their scripts using the Code icon.
Consider the scenario where a question receives only one answer. And it's wrong so its not accepted. Then the responder can accept their faulty answer after 48 hours. I would say then maybe we should have a reject button, but consider if it's already too hard to accept things then it will be doubly hard for users to reject things.